Political parties are expected to be told that trans women cannot be on women-only shortlists but trans men can.
It comes after last week's Supreme Court ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law.
Shortlists of candidates that only include women have been used by some parties since the mid-1990s to increase female representation. Labour introduced all-women shortlists (AWS) to select half of its candidates in winnable seats ahead of the 1997 general election.
Both Labour and the SNP have said they would allow trans women to access all-women shortlists in the past, with some controversy.
The Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which enforces equalities law and provides guidance to policy makers, public sector bodies and businesses, is now expected to provide updated guidance on the issue.
The EHRC has previously said it was an "anomaly" that a trans woman (who was born male) could access a women-only shortlist but a trans man (who was born female) could not.
Likewise, it said there was a discrepancy between trans women who had a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC), who could legally be on a shortlist, but trans women without one who could not.
A GRC is a legal document that recognises an individual's gender identity.
It is understood that the ruling that sex is biological will make it clear that such shortlists are only open to those who were born female.
AWS were initially found to be unlawful but an act of parliament was passed in 2002 to make the shortlists legal.
A clause in the Equality Act 2010 extended their use until 2030 but only when women are under-represented.